Volkswagen Golf 1983 vs Volvo S40 2007
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 22.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 56 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 10.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 50 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 404 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1145 litres | 883 litres | |
| Volkswagen Golf has 59 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |