Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Volvo S40 2007

 
Volkswagen Golf
1986 - 1986
Volvo S40
2007 - 2012
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP125 HP
Torque: 145 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.67.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.2 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway960 km on highway
660 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.48 m
Width: 1.67 m1.77 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller.
Volkswagen Golf is 50 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 230 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres883 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 174 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 147 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5401`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 24004600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv