Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014

 
Volkswagen Golf
1986 - 1986
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 129 HP150 HP
Torque: 168 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds7.8 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 21 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.64.7
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 585 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway1090 km on highway
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 120 mm (4.7 inches)145 mm (5.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.
Volkswagen Polo 2014 1.4 engine: One of the most notorious issues with this engine series is excessive oil consumption caused by stuck piston rings. Another common problem is the actuator of the turbocharger’s wastegate, which is prone to ...  More about Volkswagen Polo 2014 1.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m3.97 m
Width: 1.67 m1.68 m
Height: 1.41 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data952 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`680
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 22005800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv