Volkswagen Golf 1985 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 7.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 4.8 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |