Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Rover 200 1993
| Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 15 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 16 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volkswagen Golf is 18 cm shorter than the Rover 200, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1145 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 45 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. The Rover 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Rover 200 has
| |