Volkswagen Golf 1991 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 72 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 50 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
687 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |