Volkswagen Golf 2002 vs Volkswagen Bora 1999
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 235 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 55 HP more power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Volkswagen Bora. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Volkswagen Bora 1998: Vehicle is equipped with 4motion automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions, the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-plate clutch engages and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Bora engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Leon, Seat Toledo, Audi TT | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is 23 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`875 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Bora has
| |