Volkswagen Golf 1998 vs Nissan Almera 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 87 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Nissan Almera is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 12 HP less power than Nissan Almera, but torque is 12 NM more than Nissan Almera. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Bora | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is larger. Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1185 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Golf has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Volkswagen Golf uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`545 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Almera, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |