Volkswagen Golf 2003 vs Opel Astra 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 11 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Meriva | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1330 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`740 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Opel Astra has
| |