Volkswagen Golf 2003 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 14 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is larger. Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1110 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`695 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Audi A3 has
| |