Volkswagen Golf 2003 vs Audi S3 2001

 
Volkswagen Golf
2003 - 2006
Audi S3
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP225 HP
Torque: 155 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds6.6 seconds
Audi S3 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 109 HP less power than Audi S3, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Audi S3. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.49.4
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi S3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway870 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ...  More about Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.16 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is 4 cm longer than the Audi S3, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litres1020 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 80 litres more trunk space than the Audi S3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 285 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`980
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 28005400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Audi S3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv