Volkswagen Golf 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Volkswagen Golf
2008 - 2012
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP75 HP
Torque: 240 NM126 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds15.3 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 85 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 114 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.07.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.7 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m3.92 m
Width: 1.79 m1.65 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 275 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`860no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42001800
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Polo has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv