Volkswagen Golf 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 126 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 85 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 114 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
720 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is larger. Volkswagen Golf is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1030 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Golf has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 275 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |