Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9.7 seconds
Volkswagen Golf and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Golf torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 3. Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1240 km on highway
830 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.47 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Golf is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1263 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`930
Safety:
The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Mazda 3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 90007800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 3 has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv