Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Volvo V40 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf and Volvo V40 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Golf torque is 30 NM less than Volvo V40. Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
1380 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 142 mm (5.6 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Golf is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | |||
Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butVolkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 8600 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |