Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Volvo V40 2012

 
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 250 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds8.8 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 10 NM more than Volvo V40. Despite less power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.7 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1110 km on highway1340 km on highway
750 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 142 mm (5.6 inches)133 mm (5.2 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.37 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Golf is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1270 litresno data
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`910
Safety:
Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests, butVolkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo V40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 90009000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv