Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volkswagen Passat 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
1170 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 580'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 2 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 33 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`975 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |