Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Opel Omega 1995

 
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1999
Opel Omega
1995 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 145 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds14 seconds
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 26 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.19.2
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1010 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volkswagen Vento, Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.82 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.43 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller.
Volkswagen Golf is 48 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 466 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1425 litres1800 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Golf has 74 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 375 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Omega.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6502`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv