Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.2
5.3
Real fuel consumption:
5.6 l/100km
5.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora.
Fuel tank capacity:
55 litres
55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
1050 km in combined cycle
1030 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway
1240 km on highway
980 km with real consumption
930 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Bora 1999 1.9 engine: The engine is very demanding when it comes to oil quality and using poor quality lubricants will significantly reduce engine life.
Dimensions
Length:
4.40 m
4.41 m
Width:
1.74 m
1.74 m
Height:
1.47 m
1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:
460 litres
460 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1470 litres
no data
Turning diameter:
10.9 meters
11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora.