Volkswagen Golf 1999 vs Volkswagen Bora 2002

 
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Bora
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP110 HP
Torque: 145 NM155 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds11.7 seconds
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 9 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.56.3
The Volkswagen Bora is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1030 km on highway
Volkswagen Bora gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.40 m4.41 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 465 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1425 litres1470 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Bora (by 45 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6251`840
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 16001600
Rating in user reviews: 7.6/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Bora has
    • more power
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv