Volkswagen Golf 2009 vs Opel Astra 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
940 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 117 mm (4.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Golf can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Golf version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Insignia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2009 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 1550 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has 5 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Astra, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Opel Astra has
| |