Volkswagen Golf 2009 vs Opel Astra 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 78 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 117 mm (4.6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Golf can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Golf version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Volkswagen Touran | Used also on Opel Insignia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2009 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners.
Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1495 litres | 1550 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has 5 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 55 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Astra, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Opel Astra has
| |