Volkswagen Golf 1986 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | 120 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Volkswagen Beetle is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 30 HP less power than Volkswagen Beetle, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Volkswagen Beetle. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
680 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.98 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Beetle, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 209 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 769 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Beetle, which means Volkswagen Golf can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`620 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |