Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 75 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Seat Toledo, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Golf 1992 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Volkswagen Golf 1992 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Golf is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1160 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |