Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2002

 
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1997
Volkswagen Lupo
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP125 HP
Torque: 166 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds8.5 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Lupo, but torque is 14 NM more than Volkswagen Lupo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle460 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway610 km on highway
670 km with real consumption450 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.53 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.40 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 49 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1160 litres830 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 200 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 330 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6101`320
Safety: no data
Quality:Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 325 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv