Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995

 
Volkswagen Golf
1993 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP64 HP
Torque: 202 NM124 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds15.8 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.6
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1020 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Polo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat AlhambraInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.72 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
687 litres975 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 288 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`435
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv