Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 64 HP | |
Torque: | 202 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 18.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 26 HP more power than Volkswagen Vento, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Volkswagen Vento. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Vento, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Vento engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Vento might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is 36 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
687 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |