Volkswagen Golf 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Volkswagen Golf
1996 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP100 HP
Torque: 235 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds10.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.44.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km5.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1150 km on highway
840 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1030 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 350 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002000
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv