Volkswagen Golf 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

 
Volkswagen Golf
1996 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 110 HP100 HP
Torque: 235 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds10.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, but torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.04.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km5.4 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1100 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1150 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
677 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 50 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 353 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 350 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002000
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv