Volkswagen Golf 1993 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 60 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.8 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Volkswagen Golf has 4x4: Instead of a center differential, a viscous coupling is installed with a freewheel mechanism to disengage the driven axle during braking. Under normal driving conditions, 95% of the torque is transferred to the front axle. If slippage occurs, the coupling locks and up to nearly 100% of the torque is automatically transferred to the rear axle. If one front and one rear wheel lose traction, the car will not move. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1160 litres | 1030 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Golf has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 130 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 350 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |