Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 1996

 
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP75 HP
Torque: 145 NM135 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.7 seconds12.5 seconds
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle520 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway660 km on highway
590 km with real consumption520 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.72 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data975 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv