Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994

 
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
1994 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP75 HP
Torque: 145 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds12.5 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.0
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.72 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
687 litres975 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 288 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`540no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv