Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006

 
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP150 HP
Torque: 140 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.6 seconds8.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 75 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 9.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.57.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 255 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway730 km on highway
560 km with real consumption490 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
687 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 343 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5801`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 350 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv