Volkswagen Golf 1997 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006

 
Volkswagen Golf
1997 - 1997
Volkswagen Polo
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP150 HP
Torque: 140 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds8.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 75 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.47.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km9.1 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway730 km on highway
740 km with real consumption490 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
687 litres1030 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 343 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5801`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 350 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002000
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv