Volkswagen Golf 1992 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995

 
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1995
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP60 HP
Torque: 107 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.7 seconds14.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Golf torque is 9 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.06.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
760 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.72 m
Width: 1.70 m1.66 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data975 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`400
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv