Volkswagen Golf 1995 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2001

 
Volkswagen Golf
1995 - 1997
Volkswagen Lupo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP60 HP
Torque: 116 NM116 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.9 seconds14.3 seconds
Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Lupo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway690 km on highway
790 km with real consumption500 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m3.53 m
Width: 1.70 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 49 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
687 litres830 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 200 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Lupo (by 143 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5051`380
Safety: no data
Quality:Volkswagen Lupo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 325 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv