Volkswagen Golf 1999 vs Audi 80 1991
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 174 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 30 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 10.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Volkswagen Golf 1997: Haldex Generation I automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-disc clutch locks and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%). Audi 80 1990: Vehicle features full-time Quattro II all-wheel drive - Torsen center differential with automatic torque split between front and rear axles, and electro-pneumatic manually-activated rear differential that automatically unlocks at speeds above 25 km/h. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is 33 cm shorter than the Audi 80, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1185 litres | 710 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has 185 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 475 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`890 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 490 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Audi 80 has
| |