Volkswagen Golf 2000 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Audi A3. Despite the higher power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Bora | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Audi A3 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf and Audi A3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1099 litres | 1020 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has 25 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 79 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Audi A3 has
| |