Volkswagen Golf 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf 2000 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf 2000, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Golf 2000. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.1
6.2
Real fuel consumption:
6.3 l/100km
5.9 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf 2000 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Volkswagen Golf 2000 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf 2000, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Golf 2000 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf 2000.
Volkswagen Golf 1997: Haldex Generation I automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-disc clutch locks and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%).
Volkswagen Golf 1998: Haldex Generation I automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-disc clutch locks and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%).
Volkswagen Golf 2000 1.9 engine: The engine is very demanding when it comes to oil quality and using poor quality lubricants will significantly reduce engine life.
Dimensions
Length:
4.15 m
4.15 m
Width:
1.74 m
1.74 m
Height:
1.44 m
1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf 2000 and Volkswagen Golf 2000 are practically the same length.
