Volkswagen Golf 1999 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2000
Volvo V40
2016 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP120 HP
Torque: 210 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds10.5 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.53.4
Real fuel consumption: 5.6 l/100km4.9 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 315 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1140 km in combined cycle1170 km in combined cycle
1360 km on highway1250 km on highway
1120 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Volkswagen Golf has 4x4: Haldex Generation I automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-disc clutch locks and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%).

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 610'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat LeonUsed also on Volvo V40 Cross Country
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m4.37 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Golf is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1185 litres1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Golf has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 315 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`920
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 120011 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv