Volkswagen Golf 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

	Volkswagen Golf 2000 - 2003	Volkswagen Golf 1998 - 2000
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	1.6 Petrol	1.6 Petrol
Performance
Power:	105 HP	100 HP
Torque:	148 NM	145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	10.8 seconds	10.9 seconds
	Volkswagen Golf 2000 engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf 1998, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Volkswagen Golf 1998. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.9	7.4
Real fuel consumption:	7.5 l/100km	8.0 l/100km
	The Volkswagen Golf 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf 2000 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf 1998, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf 2000 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf 1998.
Fuel tank capacity:	55 litres	55 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	790 km in combined cycle	740 km in combined cycle
	1000 km on highway	960 km on highway
	730 km with real consumption	680 km with real consumption
	Volkswagen Golf 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Volkswagen Golf 1998 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Volkswagen Golf 1998 1.6 engine
Dimensions
Length:	4.15 m	4.15 m
Width:	1.74 m	1.74 m
Height:	1.44 m	1.44 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf 2000 and Volkswagen Golf 1998 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:	330 litres	no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1184 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	10.9 meters	10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg):	1`750	no data

Safety:
Quality:	high	high
Average price (€):	1200	1400
Rating in user reviews:	7.3/10	7.4/10
Pros and Cons:	Volkswagen Golf has lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Volkswagen Golf 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions