Volkswagen Golf 1997 vs Volvo V40 2016

 
Volkswagen Golf
1997 - 2000
Volvo V40
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP152 HP
Torque: 145 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds8.3 seconds
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 51 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.45.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.4 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 375 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway1210 km on highway
580 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf 1997 1.6 engine: The most common issues with this engine are unstable idle and excessive vibrations. These problems are often resolved by cleaning the fuel injectors or the throttle body. Another frequent source of trouble ...  More about Volkswagen Golf 1997 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.15 m4.37 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Golf is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Golf is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data324 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1500 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight: no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 120011 400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv