Volkswagen Golf 1997 vs Audi A3 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 128 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 75 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Bora | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Audi A3 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.15 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf and Audi A3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1020 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`850 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Audi A3 has
| |