Volkswagen Golf 2003 vs Volvo C30 2006

 
Volkswagen Golf
2003 - 2006
Volvo C30
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP109 HP
Torque: 320 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds11.9 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 31 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.44.9
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1300 km on highway
880 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.25 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litresno data
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Golf has 99 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo C30.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9101`780
Safety:
Quality:
high

below average
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo C30, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 20004600
Rating in user reviews: 8.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo C30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv