Volkswagen Golf 2003 vs Suzuki Liana 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 13 HP more power than Suzuki Liana, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Suzuki Liana. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 24 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine often report difficulties starting in cold weather. Carbon buildup tends to cause sticking in the intake valves, throttle body, and EGR valve, leading to performance ... More about Volkswagen Golf 2003 1.6 engine Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Liana, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 348 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1062 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has 2 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Liana. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 243 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.9 metres more than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |