Volkswagen Golf 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009

 
Volkswagen Golf
2009 - 2012
Volkswagen Polo
2009 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 210 HP75 HP
Torque: 280 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds14 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 135 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.34.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km4.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 465 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1250 km on highway
640 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m3.97 m
Width: 1.79 m1.68 m
Height: 1.48 m1.49 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 23 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1305 litres952 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 70 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 353 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`8701`650
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 36004000
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv