Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 3.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
920 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower. Volkswagen Golf is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1270 litres | 952 litres | |
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Golf has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 318 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 8200 | 5800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.7/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |