Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Nissan Pulsar 2015

 
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Nissan Pulsar
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP190 HP
Torque: 250 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds7.7 seconds
Nissan Pulsar is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 50 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, but torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3no data
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres46 litres
750 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.39 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.52 m
Volkswagen Golf is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres385 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1270 litres1395 litres
Volkswagen Golf has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 125 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Volkswagen Golf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`785
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Pulsar is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Pulsar has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 82007200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Nissan Pulsar has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv