Volkswagen Golf 2012 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014

 
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 85 HP90 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds10.8 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.0 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1020 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1120 km on highway
830 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Volkswagen Caddy, Audi A1Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m3.97 m
Width: 1.80 m1.68 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger, but slightly lower.
Volkswagen Golf is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 380 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1270 litres952 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 100 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 318 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7201`620
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 80006800
Rating in user reviews: 8.7/10 6.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv