Volkswagen Golf 2020 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
Volkswagen Golf
2020 - 2023
Mazda 3
2019 - 2021
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP116 HP
Torque: 250 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds12.1 seconds
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.6
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Golf could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.66 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Golf is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 611 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1642 litres1138 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 504 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.1 metersno data
Gross weight: 2`010 kg1`914 kg
Net weight:1`413 kg1`401 kg
Load capacity:597 kg513 kg
Volkswagen Golf load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Mazda 3. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): no data14 600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv